Ethical Treatment of Prisoners Essay

Ethical Treatment of Prisoners BY MeltssaoT People in society straightaway keep back rules, regulations, and guidelines to follow in establish to maintain exemption, safety, structure, and self-discipline. If any of these rules are broken, at that place are consequences to follow. It depends on the severity of the crime on what graphic symbol of punishment or consequence is given to an individual. If the crime is severe generous the individual may be deprived of their rights, freedom of movement, and sent to prison for a duration of time.If one is sent to prison then the honest treatment of prisoners rights must be taking into circumstance and analyzed. A prisoner/ yard bird is a person that has committed a whitlow offence and depending on their criminal history he or she may be put on probation or entrapd to a county Jail or state penitentiary. Once an individual gets behind those bend walls their lives then tend to belong to the deputies, correctional officer or warden that is engaged by that facility.Within the prison system there is a parting of power that exists. This power can leave feelings of power slightness and dependency in the prisoners. We all have heard stories of correction officers using their power of liberty to abuse and psychologically harm the prisoner. For example a couple of months ago in the state that I live in there was an bunco who was locked up for a minor charge of failure to appear. He was waiting for his dinner this particular change surfaceing, and the deputy almost slammed the inmate finger in the door.Of course this escalade into a verbal altercation between the two, and from there a physical fight broke out. The deputy which outweighed the inmate by over 100 pounds picked up the inmate and slammed him on his head onto a concrete floor multiple times until the inmate was unconscious. The Jailhouse officials zip this inmate to the ospital in which he went into a coma, and nonethelesstually was placed on life support. The family of this inmate was faced with a difficult situation which was each remove him from life support or leave him there to run out a away.In the end the family made the decision to remove their deal one from life support, and the deputy was behind a minor criminal matter the question is did he be to be treated less than a human being? Did he really merit to die out? Some people might argue the fact that because he was locked up then he deserved the treatment that he got and others might voice the difference. I personally say no, because this is still a life and even though he made a mistake there should have been a correct way to go about punishment for this inmate if he really had got out of order.When law abiding citizens and correctional officers come along at prisoners, it does not matter what the crime was or how severe the punishment, a prisoner is a nobody. In the United States there are umpteen people that may take and have strong feelings when it c omes to this statement. In ethics a utilitarian may say that human beings should focus on the potential rules of an action and determine what would happen if e or she follows the rules. utile hypothesis states the moral worth of an action should be determined specifically by its usefulness in maximizing utility and minimizing negative utility.The manhood as a whole has a moral code on how people should conduct themselves, on what is right and wrong. The belief of the utilitarian theory can be used in prisons to help those that really sine qua non to be rehabilitated. I am not saying that this theory result work for all, moreover there are both(prenominal) men and women that deserve another chance in life. We have to realize that everyone makes mistakes n their life, some are worse than others, but in the end everyone still deserves to be treated with dignity and respect, no matter what they may have done.I have heard stories about men that may have rape or killed a little c hild is sent to prison the correctional officers tend to sometime turn their heads and let the other inmates beat him or rape him until he is almost dead. I dont agree with the fact that he hurt a child but at the same time I dont think that its chastely right that they allow the other inmates to Jeopardize what little bit of freedom that they may have behind hose prison walls every.The ethical resolution to this is when you do have a child rapist sent to prison put those shell of people in a area amongst themselves and mayhap have counselors around where they can get a better grounds of this person sick creative thinker because sometimes these people that do these type of things have had some type of trauma when they were a child. It is unethical to confine an individual to a correctional facility and expose this individual to danger.When you slop about ethics in prison, in the eyes of some that is either driving by hat facility yard every twenty-four hours or has never real ly been behind those thick masculine proscribe then one may say that these people are animals and they deserve to be behind those bars. Once behind those bars their life changes because they have to be told when to eat, when to sleep, when to walk and talk. If an inmate is not like by a correctional officer or if one does not follow order then they may be deprived of food or even yard time. Torture and beatings will not correct their behavior but will make them more aggressive so that choice is not the best.If any of these things should appen then this may lead to riots and in serious scenarios, cleanup spot of security guards. It is best to provide the basic needs such as food to the prisoners so that there is a harmonious reaction between the prisoner and the correction officer. The utilitarian would say that inmates should follow a virtuously right rule that would result in happiness in which at a time they are drop dead to society they can determine what rules citizens. Lear ning confident(p) rules will result to good behavior and a change of mind that life without freedom is something that one may not want to return to. In contrast..