Stolen Generation Facts Term Paper Essay Example for Free

Stolen Generation Facts bourn Paper Essay autochthonic children have been forcibly separated from their families and communities since the very first days of the European occupation of Australia obtained from the bring Them interior(a) ReportWho are the Stolen GenerationsThe term stolen generations is in reference to those aborigine and Torres whirl island-d wellspringer people who were forcibly removed, as children, from their families and communities by judicature, upbeat and affiliated church organisations. These children were systematically put into institutional cope or with non- natural foster families. Although it can be argued that the removal of immemorial and Torres Strait Islander children began as early as the very first days of European occupation in Australia, the force removal policies and lawmaking began in the mid 1800s and continued until the 1970s. There is current discourse in primordial communities supporting the notion that the removal of abor igine children from their families and communities continues to exist today in the form of complexities associated with current government policies and legislation and the over representation of native Australian children in out of home care.How and why do we greet the forcible removal of Aboriginal children occurred in NSW?New southeastern Wales, along with other Australian enounce and territory governments have acknowledged historic practices and policies of forced removal of Indigenous children on the basis of race.The Bringing Them Home Report, commissioned by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) and presented to the Australian government in 1997 came out of the HREOC National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families. This report was central to documenting depict relating to the forcible removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in NSW and Australia wide. This report contains exte nsive evidence of past practices and policies which resulted in the removal of children. It also details the conditions into which many of the children were placed and discusses the negative impact this has had on individuals, their families and the broader Indigenous community.The Bringing Them Home Report (1997, p. 651) extensively suggested 53 detailed recommendations to the Council of Australian Governments.For further information on the Bringing Them Home Report and the recommendations that were put forward to the Australian government, please go to http//www.hreoc.gov.au/social_Justice/bth_report/report/index.htmlLink-Up NSW a Koori organisation founded in 1980 was established to assist the Stolen Generations in finding their way home as well as support families of people who were separated from their children.This removal occurred as the result of official laws and policies aimed at assimilative the Indigenous population into the wider community.What is a Koori?There are many terms in use most Australia for the word Aborigine. In most areas of NSW the term Koori is used. There are several other haggle which are used around Australia such as Goori (northern NSW/QLD), Murri (northern NSW/QLD), Nunga (SA) and Nyoongah (WA). There are many areas/regions that have carry their cultural language and have different terms to describe themselves Link Up NSW.Timeline of government legislationThe below synopsis can be identified as proof of an extensive history of legislative frameworks provided for the removal of Aboriginal children from their families, clans and communities, through an english common law regime in NSW. Under the simulation of protection, Aboriginal people were subject to near total control.This systematic approach to the forcible removal of Aboriginal children in NSW can be identified by many government Acts including1810s Governor Macquarie Proclamation 4 May 1816, Aborigines declared subject to the protection of British law, but any crime s may render them nix and lead to loss of privileges1849 Act to provide for the Care and Education of Infants who may be convicted of Felony or assault whereby a child under the age of 19 is convicted, court may assign care and wait of the child to such persons as make application where the court is satisfied it is for the benefit of the child.1881 State Children computer backup Act State Childrens Relief circuit card established. Boarding out officers may remove children from good-hearted institutions and arrange for them to be boarded out in licensed homes.1908 Establishment of Bomaderry United Aborigines Mission HomeConsequently, the Aborigines testimonial Board set-up in 1909 contributed to the United Aborigines Mission home at Bomaderry on the NSW south coast where young children and babies were placed.1909 Aborigines excuse Act Established the Aborigines Protection Board (APB) for the Protection of Aborigines. The duration of this Act was for 60 years until it s replacement in 1969. A key provision of this Act was to provide for the custody, maintenance and education of the children of Aborigines.1911 Establishement of Cootamundra Girls HomeCootamundra was the first of the homes for Aboriginal children set up by the APB. The main aim of the Board was to rescue Aboriginal children from their families and assimilate them into the white community. Girls were the main target of the Board, especially so-called half-caste or mixed blood girls. The girls were skilful as domestic servants and sent out to work for middle class white families.1915 Aboriginal Protection Amending Act Removed the requirement that an Aboriginal child had to be found to be dischargeed beforehand the Board could remove him/her.The discourse associated with the presumption of neglect, a requirement initially implemented by the Act was disem indicanting for Aboriginal mothers, fathers and families as there was no recourse for Aboriginal people who challenged the notio n of neglect that was often decided at the whim of a government inspectors own beliefs and values these officials held the sole power in determining neglect. This practice was further exacerbated by views of assimilation of Aboriginal people into mainstream white company to ease the pillow of Aboriginal people as a dying race.1918 Establishment of Kinchela Boys HomeThe Board established Kinchela Training Institution in northern NSW for boys. The APB opened the Kinchela Boys Home with the official purpose of providing rearing for Aboriginal boys between the ages of five and fifteen. These boys were taken from their families by the State from all over New South Wales.1940 Aborigines Protection (Amendment) Act Aborigines Protection Board replaced by the Aborigines Welfare Board (AWB). This Board took responsibility for Aboriginal wards removed under the Child Welfare Act 1939. This Board had the power to establish homes for the reception, maintenance, education and dressing of wa rds. This included the administration of the major institutions already established in NSW including Kinchela, Cootamundra, and the Bomaderry Childrens Home.The Board administered apprenticeships and young Aboriginal children were indentured to work (farm hands/domestics). Wages of the children were to be paid to the board and kept in a trust account for use by the Board for the wards benefit until the ward moody 21.1943 Aborigines Protection (Amendment) Act The Board is the authority in relation to children admitted to its control with power over removal and transfer of wards, apprenticing wards and approving custody of wards.1969 Repealed by the Aborigines Act Aborigines Welfare Board abolished. Aboriginal children under the care of the AWB to become wards of the state. Aboriginal childrens institutions deemed to be depots under the Child Welfare Act 1939 and subsequent child welfare legislation.The apology Why was it important to apologise to the Stolen Generations?Recommend ation 5a (2) from the Bringing Them Home Report suggests that all Australian parliaments negotiate with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission a form of words for official apologies to Indigenous individuals, families and communities and extend those apologies with wide and culturally appropriate publicity.This issue is a blank spot in the history of Australia. The damage and trauma these policies caused are felt everyday by Aboriginal people. They internalise their grief, iniquity and confusion, inflicting further pain on themselves and others around them. It is about time the Australian Government openly current responsibility for their actions (Archie Roach and Ruby Hunter in Buti A, Bringng Them Home the ALSA Way).In essence, formal government apologies provided a way for Australian governments to recognise the damning effects of removal policies of the past. The lifelong profoundly disabling consequences of those taken, meant that they disconnected all connecti on to family, traditional land, culture and language.On 14 November 1996, the Premier of NSW, Bob Carr, became the first principal of an Australian government to respond to the call from the Governor General, Sir William Deane, for all Parliaments to reaffirm their commitment to reconciliation. The Premiers resolution was passed unanimously. The NSW Premier was also the first state leader to offer a formal apology to the Aboriginal people for the Stolen Generations.On 13th February 2008, in a historic speech, Prime Minister Kevin rudd made a formally apology to the Stolen Generations in his first official parliamentary sitting which was the outset of the 42nd parliament of the commonwealth. Receving a formal apology by the Prime Minsiter of Australia has allowed the start of the healing adjoinIn a response to the National apology to the Stolen Generations, Tom Calma, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander societal Justice Commissioner, HREOC stated Through one direct act, Parliam ent has acknowledged the existence and the impacts of the past policies and practices of forcibly removing Indigenous children from their families. And by doing so, has paid respect to the Stolen Generations for their suffering and loss. For their resilience. And ultimately, for their dignity.