Law and ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Law and ethics - Essay ExampleThe article discusses the regulations of 49 countries in order to determine how they affect equity issuance. The issue is very relevant as, according to Mahoney, there is a promoters problem occurs, when the sellers abidet provide guarantees that the equities they sell are reliable (Mahoney, 1995). Thus, the paper analyses the honors regulating the rake market propositions in each state and researches the connection among these rules and the slipway stock markets use to increase profits. We analyze the specific provisions in securities laws governing initial public offerings in each country, examine the relationship between these provisions and various measures of stock market development, and interpret the evidence in light of the available theories of securities laws (LaPorta et al, 2004). Also the article provides the results interpretations made in accordance with interchangeable theories of shelter regulation (LaPorta et al, 2004). First, the authors represent three assumptions as for the influence the regulation may have on the stock market. The conclusions were strongly supported by hypotheses. The authors adjust three hypotheses the first states that market regulation is not needed. This hypothesis is supported by Coase (1960) and Stigle (1964). These experts pay attention to the fact of information disclosure that is provoked by security regulation Issuers of securities have an incentive to disclose all available information to obtain higher prices simply because failure to disclose would cause investors to exact the worst (LaPorta et al, 2004). At the same time the next two hypotheses state that market needs regulation as the investors should be protected from cheating. Stock investments ordinarily prescribes high expenses and if the investors are cheated, loses they bear are too serious. Thus, the government should issue special security laws in order to regulate the climate in the stock markets. Both reputatio ns and get down and tort law are insufficient to keep promoters from cheating investors because the payoff from cheating is too high and because private tort and contract litigation is too expensive and unpredictable to serve as a deterrent. To reduce the enforcement costs and opportunistic behavior, the government can introduce a securities law that specifies the contracting framework. The two alternative hypotheses differ in what kind of government intervention would be optimal within such a framework (LaPorta et al, 2004). Therefore, the close important conclusion made by the authors of the article is that stock markets really cant do without regulation as it makes much for their prosperity. Secondly, the results show that security regulation means much as it help conclude contracts instead of preventing people from concluding them. Precisely, it was revealed that many aspects of public administration do not cope with the important role. On the contrary the regulation usually helps investors recuperate the expenses predominantly in the large markets. Thus, the conclusion was made that the larger the market is, the more double-dyed(a) monitoring it demands (Barth, Caprio, and Levine, 2003). The authors in any case emphasize the importance of monitoring the disagreements that occur between the stockholders and investors. It is really essential for the market development. Special attention should be paid also to the change in regulation that would promote economic development and eliminate the gap between the states