Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Do you struggle to bring forth equilibrium between excelling at lock and drop deading productive, quality succession with love adepts at dental plate? With the technology that is useable in the twenty first century, it is directly possible for better professionals to decide whether they would same to tap from main office and meet with family members to fulfill imprint demands. Alesia capital of Alabama is an African American Ethnographer who wrote Kitchen Conferences and Garage Cubicles The Merger of Home and make for in the 24-7 Global Economy.This r all(prenominal)(prenominal) was one of some(prenominal) published in 2008s defy entitled The changing Landscape of Work and Family in the American Middle Class Reports From the Field, which focused on providing insights into the changing nature of working families in the United States (1008). capital of Alabamas main(prenominal) financial statement is that todays advanced(a) society and global economy withdraw e nabled families to merge work and ingleside in quasi-entrepreneurial vogues (1018), which leave in go deepen the attachment between family members.Her collateral claim is that the merging of these twain creative activitys does not come without a d take inside your foundation pull up stakes no longer serve as a refuge from suppose pressures (1018) and pedigree demands may be made much invasive by the use of modern communication technology (1019). The main blueprint of this leaven is to recognize and analyze capital of Alabamas main and secondary arguments, to mention two types of support she uses, how they help her claims, and to identify her intended earshot.capital of Alabama proposes that transformations in gender relations, charge strategies, and technological practices (1018) play entire roles in the opportunities for families to decide how to combine or counter poise their home lives with work demands. She goes on to state that womens access to allude educ ation and equal employment opportunities need expanded the possibilities for spousal collaboration in technical professions (1010), and that being able to gather on work projects at home allow for establish a much intimate and interdependent family.She then provides statistics demonstrate the percentage of women graduating with a degree in engineering jumped 16. 5% in and 30 years (1011). The statistics provide enceinte evidence to her claim that women ar gaining increase access to technology based melodic phrases, and appeals to the contributors password. capital of Alabama spent a period of five years in the field following a bridge in their thirties, who were living in one of these collaborative, job-sharing (1012) middle segmentation families in target to obtain a view of the origination from their perspective (1008).Basing her argument off this look into provides a stronger activated connection to the musical composition than if Montgomery were to use sweepi ng generalizations throughout. Montgomery structures her essay in a yarn format, indite in the first person. She was prosperous at attempting to appeal to her listenings ethos by fashioning her writing less(prenominal) formal duration retentivity an educated voice. The writing opens with an introduction to Marjenah and Steve, who sh are a home with Marjenahs parents in ti Valley.Montgomery appeals to her readers pathos by illustrating the familys world Emails, faxes and phone calls linked their home to advanced firms within Silicon Valley. Although there were no parking lots or numbered suites, their neighborhoodwas, in some sense, a busy industrial park (1009). Montgomery recalls the various routes in which they affirm upon each early(a)(a), and states that the interdependence this family possesses is an opportunity for each member help one otherwise handle job demands.She details the unnumbered nights Steve spent on his wifes projects after getting home from hi s job as well as the way Marjenah was needed to proof read Steves reports and to review her mothers paperwork for her surgical incision store job. The father worked at an outdoors tech firm, but served as the familys technical support (1016). This ethnographic question directly relates to her main point that compare in the education within a family has enabled collaboration in the home, and allows us to spend more time with those we love.Combining the statistics that exhibit women gaining access to technical jobs are increase with the representation of a modern, job-sharing family that include both sexes collaborating on high-tech projects helps validate the essays argument. Montgomerys remnant is to inform families of naked as a jaybird opportunities on how to balance work and home life, so in order to provide a well(p) picture she explores the potential downsides to living in a modern job-sharing family.Montgomerys secondary claim states that working collaboratively on job t asks at home (1018) will increase family cohesion (1018), but that this combination will in turn lead the idea of your home being an melt from job pressures. She helps substantiate this argument by referring again to the subjects of her determine, an emotional appeal. Steve summarized his perception of the situation, explaining that job demands limited the control that they had over the time and space of family life (1019).Montgomery makes her audience connect to this point on an emotional level by describing the conflicts the couple experience because of the stresses their job-sharing created. She details Marjenah having to constantly manage sounds (1015), as well as the couple getting into arguments over the amount of energy each puts into one anothers work, citing that sometimes the main incentive for them to make up was the pressure of work calling again. It is do to the reader that Montgomery is simply making an argument to explore this alternative lifestyle.She uses man y different types of support throughout her writing in order to make her argument more informative two will be analyzed further. Montgomery unceasingly includes professional opinions with quotes from past studies that are on the same topic as her own work. This gives the reader necessary background acquaintance on the topic, by allowing the audience to vex a more complete grounds as to how the economy has been playing a role in the decisions we make regarding how we balance our lives, since the industrial Revolution.She opens with a quote from nineteenth century generator John Ruskin, which states home will only be home, until the anxieties of the satellite life penetrate into it (1008). This grabs her readers attention, and provides a possible thesis for her writing. Montgomery explains separating work and home life has not always been the normal ideal, bountiful her reader a brief history on the transformation of family labor from agrarian to high-tech work (1010). She does this with quotes and ideas from over ten different sources, many of the sources she chose are known in the fields of Anthropology and Sociology.This is extremely helpful for her good appeal, because it shows Montgomery took the time to gain an sympathy of the contextual relevance of her selected topic. Some of the work she cites claims things such(prenominal) as In the earlier twentieth century, corporations supplanted many family firms, credentialed engineers replaced informally dexterous mechanics, and big sciencerose to prominence. (1011) and that Industrial transformationsincreasingly removed production from the home, date cultural transformations valorized home as a haven from the harsh work world (1010).This relates to the quote she opens with, because Ruskin was one of the numerous writers displace to get the rising middle class to embrace this new ideal (1010), face lift the question of the motives behind said quote. Including other pieces of writing that claim technol ogy is what vie a key positionor in changing the way individuals and families balanced their two lives, historically, helps her introduce the idea that separate spheres are not necessarily the most in demand(predicate) family and work forms (1018). Montgomery uses examples to support her arguments, which helps create a mental image in her audiences mind date reading her work.Her research gathered while with Marjenahs family, is her most used example, and is a very effective form of support. In Montgomerys eyes, Marjenahs family exemplifies how new technologies, management strategies, and gender relations are changing the possibilities for work collaborations within households (1012). She refers to their particular(prenominal) situation as a way to personalize Montgomerys reason emphasis on womens comparability in education and job opportunities as being the main factor in society once again giving families the option to draw in and collaborate on work.She uses examples while giving her audience background knowledge of this topic. She starts with an example describing how employers relied upon fathers to subdue family work units in some early factories (1010). She makes the claim that shop-keeping families saw kin as sources of income (1010), more specifically using examples such as the bakers wife iced cakes a few steps from her husband, the blooper and his son chopped meat on the same counter, and for the family of grocers home and work merge (1010).These examples support her statement that the separation of spheres was neither decisive nor abrupt. (1010). Montgomery does a equal job regarding the amount of support she provides her audience with to back up her argument. Every writer has an intended audience. Montgomerys study was published in a book that has a goal to highlight how subtlety shapes family life during shifting social and sparing landscapes, so it should address a sensibly educated audience.The background information provided impl ies that she was keeping in mind the fact that not everyone who picks up her book will have an understanding of the different norms our society has at peace(p) through regarding the separation of work and home life. To conclude, Montgomery was very successful in presenting her argument that contemporary gender relations, management strategies and technological practices enable divers family and work formsFar from weakening family bonds, these mergers of work value family cohesion (1010).She appealed to her audiences logos by providing facts, statistics, expert opinions, and by citing other pieces of work on her topic. This also helped her respectable appeal, as did the personal afterward expound her background and her credentials. Using the example of Marjenahs family, along with the baker, butcher and grocers, helped Montgomery emotionally appeal to her audience, and to get her point across. Overall, Montgomery presented her argument very clearly it was fact based, and very inf ormative which makes her exploratory propose a success.